Customize your website

Troubling turn for the fifth estate



Published on May 9th, 2010
Published on May 9th, 2010
Transcontinental Staff RSS Feed
Topics :
National Post , Supreme Court of Canada

A decision by the Supreme Court of Canada handed down Friday may only get

passing attention from most Canadians, but for those within the fifth estate

it represents a troubling turn in their profession.

The court has decided that journalists have no constitutional right to

protect confidential sources, ruling 8-1 against the National Post in a

decade-old case dealing with a possibly forged document linked to the

Shawinigate scandal of the former Liberal government of Jean Chretien.

For those who don't remember, Shawinigate was a 1990s political scandal in

which Chretien was accused of profiting from real estate deals in his Quebec

riding.

While most Canadians couldn't care less about this decision, the public

often relies on the media to serve as the whistle-blower when it comes to

rooting out corruption in government and other matters.

Protecting a source is not something reporters take lightly, since it is a

reporter's sacred responsibilities. It is to us what the Hippocratic oath is

to doctors. If a source comes to a reporter and will spill his or her guts

in return for protection, it's up to the reporter to do just that. Until

now, most journalists could do so without fear of going to jail.

The National Post argued that turning over the material provided to a

reporter by a confidential source would compromise the identity of that

source since it would be tested for DNA and fingerprints. The court, on the

other hand, said journalists have no constitutional immunity to protect

sources and any such claims would have to be weighed on a case-by-case

basis. In this case, it said the right of police to investigate a potential

crime outweighs the newspaper's right to protect a source.

That's all well in good, but the public has come to rely on the media to

live up to its ideals and that includes protecting those with important

information and telling stories that need to be told. If those

whistleblowers feel they can't be protected they may be hesitant to come

forward, making it even more difficult to expose wrongdoing in the halls of

power.

Comments

  • Username
    Margie
    - May 19th, 2010 at 09:37:11

    It's about time..... this will stop those "informanents" who lie to be part of the story or as part of a "get even thing"

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    PJ
    - May 11th, 2010 at 09:43:15

    One of the growing threats to press in this case is the growing number of pseudo-press outlets like Twitter and blogs. Many of these "reporters" are calling themselves "press" and that opens the door for seeking protections for lies and mi-information being spread and "protecting their sources" which may not even exist. The legitimate press is a service to the citizens but this shadow prss is quite another thing.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

Truro Daily News is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

loading...

Click here to read the latest issue!

Advertising