Customize your website

New TreeGO locale has merit



Published on March 4th, 2010
Published on March 4th, 2010
Truro Daily News RSS Feed
Topics :
Truro town council , Jacob's , Victoria Park , Wood Street , Truro

Not surprisingly, Truro town council has nixed a hugely controversial proposal to set up an aerial adventure park – aka TreeGO – in one of the highest traffic areas of Victoria Park.

That's not to suggest the idea didn't have merit because we think it does, as do many of our readers.

But the avalanche of opposition – protest marches, cyberspace campaigns, letters, website comments, phone calls - against zip-lines traversing the gorge near Jacob's Ladder and rope bridges dangling below Lewis Road simply couldn't be ignored.

Not by council. Not by anyone.

Victoria Park, quite simply, is a very special place for many people who like it just the way it is and their wishes should be respected.

Still, we're intrigued by the possibility of setting up TreeGO in a much less-travelled portion of the park, located on the west side of Wood Street and along the south side of Serpentine Drive. 

It would be out of sight to the vast majority of visitors who only hike a small portion of the park and it would also address the arguments of those who feel that TreeGO would help attract visitors to downtown Truro.

Hey, in a roundabout way it may even reduce certain activity near Wood Street. After all, who wants to complete a drug deal or engage in a bit of outdoor sex with tourists zipping by about 50 feet above you?

Many will counter that commercializing one square inch of Victoria Park is sacrilegious, that it is not for sale under any circumstances and maybe they are right.

But we can't help worrying about the town's economic future should Truro downtown business core slowly disappear due to competition from beyond its boundaries.

Does this bleak senario hinge entirely upon the location of an adventure park in a park? 

Of course not, but the latest proposed TreeGO location shouldn't be dismissed outright, either.

Comments

  • Username
    Michelle from Truro
    - March 9th, 2010 at 07:41:42

    Wanda - this "compromise" is not great at all. Your right, the park does belong to all of us, the wildlife and birds too. Or does the group for Treego seem to forget that? Everyone talks about how great Treego is, and how well the park in Moncton does. Well, I am going to throw this out there. The park in Moncton is used to a population like Moncton. The increased 20000 + people in our park, is something it's not used to. And will suffer greatly from. The wildlife will be displaced, and the birds and their nesting areas will be as well. And please, if I am wrong. Show me the documentation. And not just what Tregoo or Moncton Rec says about their park. As again, its used to sustaining their population. The park's main concern should be everyone's priority. Not just those of us who don't want Treego in there. I am in there every week. How often are you there? I believe the park is more important then Treego and what they have to offer.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    another truro resident
    - March 5th, 2010 at 07:30:24

    I think this article gives many reasons why Treego SHOULD be dismissed outright, but then tries to say in the last sentence that is shouldn't be, but gives no real reason why not. The writer says that of course the scenario doesn't hinge entirely upon the location of an adventure park in a park, so what is the real problem with putting it elsewhere? I also agree that trying to use drug deals and sex as a reason is definitely poor taste, and is a poor argument as well for more than one reason. If people want to deal drugs they will still do it somewhere in the park, perhaps even closer to jacobs ladder and the parts of the park where people take their families. Treego is not in any way a solution to truros drug problems. I've also noticed comments on the internet from many young people saying they are going to use the aerial park while drunk or high and they haven't been corrected by supporters. This concerns me deeply. Also, the reason why a minority of gay individuals have sex at the park is because of the lack of acceptance and bigotry in this town. People have to sneak around because they are afraid of being beat up and rejected from society. They need to be treated with respect, not associated with drug deals and other problems. Shame on you for printing something that is so obviously prejudiced against the gay community.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Wanda
    - March 4th, 2010 at 10:41:20

    This proposed area of the park will be a great compromise. Victoria Park belongs to all of us and it is good to see that Council understands this. Despite what has been reported, there are at least 2500 supporters of TreeGo being set up in the park and Town Council has heard our voices as well. Thank you for no ignoring us!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Another Truro Resident
    - March 4th, 2010 at 10:22:43

    Poor taste? Just saying it how it is I think. Why bother with all the politically correct wordings. Everyone is thinking it - it is just nice to hear someone say it. The minute they announce that it will go at the top of wood st. - are people going to think that it is an equally lovely spot - NO - they're going to think about the most recent happenings in the news about Wood st... sex and drugs, and how TreeGo would be a great way to cover it up. Just because someone doesn't write it as eloquently as you would prefer, you needn't judge the "taste" as I am sure many readers (myself included) find it refreshing to just read it how it is.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Truro Resident
    - March 4th, 2010 at 09:04:39

    Wow.... poor taste :( I am surprised TDN published this at all.....

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

Truro Daily News is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

loading...

Click here to read the latest issue!

Advertising