• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (5)
  •  

Housing subsidies should be available for all seniors, private care homeowners believe

 Sheila Archibald, left, and Val Dorey are both owners of private care facilities who believe provincial regulations should be changed to enable all seniors to receive housing subsidies, regardless of where they call home. HARRY SULLIVAN TRURO DAILY NEWS

Sheila Archibald, left, and Val Dorey are both owners of private care facilities who believe provincial regulations should be changed to enable all seniors to receive housing subsidies, regardless of where they call home. HARRY SULLIVAN TRURO DAILY NEWS

Published on October 16, 2012
Published on October 16, 2012

NDP government, however, has no plans to change policy

Topics :
Archibald and Val Dorey , Colchester Regional Hospital , Department of Health , Nova Scotia , Brookfield , Hilden

BRENTWOOD - All Nova Scotia seniors should be eligible for the same subsidies, regardless of where they call home, the owners of two private care facilities say.

And Sheila Archibald, owner of the Brentwood Ponds near Brookfield, said she is in the process of contacting Health Minister David Wilson on the matter.

"Why shouldn't every senior be subsidized, instead of, ‘We will subsidize you but you go where we tell you?"' Archibald said.

Archibald and Val Dorey, owner of Val's Resthome in Hilden, both run private-care facilities, which unlike licensed nursing homes, do not receive government subsidization for the seniors they care for.

Between the two facilities there currently are 10 empty beds, which the women believe would go a long ways towards easing the bed shortage at the Colchester Regional Hospital. Both Archibald and Dorey believe the government needs to make immediate changes to its regulations to bring private care facilities under the subsidization umbrella, even if that means their homes have to be brought up to safety and fire codes.

"They need to put rules and regulations in place for seniors care in private care homes with 24-hour care and supervision," Archibald said.

"But we have been advised by NDP Gary Burrill (MLA for Colchester-Musquodoboit Valley) as well as deputy minister of health (Kevin McNamara) that this government will not change their policy regarding subsidizing our seniors to go into private care homes. There are existing private care homes in this province with empty beds due to the inability of government to make changes in their policy regarding the subsidies for seniors."

Currently, about 2,250 seniors across the province are on waiting lists for long-term care beds. The NDP government added $22 million to this year's budget to help seniors remain in their homes longer, part of which is used to provide a $400 per month allowance for low-income people who are receiving care in their homes from an otherwise unpaid caregiver.

Archibald believes that money should also be available to seniors living in private care facilities.

"All seniors should be subsidized regardless of what home they want to go to or if they want to stay in their own home," she said.

"All we're asking for is that there is an alternative for the seniors to have the choice to come to our private home or (if) waiting, until they get into the licensed home that they picked," Dorey added.

While the government's initiative to help enable seniors to remain in their own homes longer may have good intentions, the women said the fact remains that too many seniors who are living alone, "... that are in unsafe conditions and should not be there without 24-hour supervision."

Archibald said she has heard first-hand stories from caregivers who visit such homes of seniors "stumbling all over the place" or living in the midst of cat feces and urine.

"And the government is actually paying them to stay there in unsafe conditions," she said. "Unfortunately, most of the nurses aren't allowed to speak out."

The women said they got no satisfaction from their meetings with either McNamara or Burrill. And, quite to the contrary, both said they actually felt threatened by the response they received.

"His comment back to us was that we should keep quiet or we could be inspected and our homes would be shut down," Archibald said, of Burrill. "He sat there and advised us that the government wasn't going to make changes and that we should actually keep quiet, keep on doing what we're doing, and that if we make waves that the government could come in, do inspections and shut us down. I take that as a threat."

Dorey said she received the same message and that if they were to continue with their campaign for subsidization, it would be "opening up a whole new can of worms and it was better for us to keep quiet ..."

Burrill acknowledged meeting with the owners on the issue but he expressed shock that his intentions were perceived as threatening.

"I came to the conclusion in talking about trying to understand the changed situation of those private homes in South Colchester, in studying it and talking about it in the Department of Health, I came to the conclusion that their campaign to become subsidizable had no hope of success," he said.

"But I think that to speak of that as a threat or in the way that you've described to me, is an unfaithful interpretation of anything that I would have said."

 

 

Comments

  • Username
    Concerned for our Seniors
    - October 17, 2012 at 14:54:58

    As a child of a senior living in a long term care facility that is subsidized by the Provincial Government, I can tell you first hand that I've questioned the RN/LPN/CCA to client ratio in these facilities & it would scare you to see how the # of beds vs. care plays out. The private facilities would definitely have to be up to code but where is all this $$ going to come from to bring to code & supply professionals to care for our elderly?? The Province is not going to budge, & it's a sad feeling & an uphill battle for sure to know that there is not enough $$ for seniors to live out their final years. It actually disgusts me! These seniors deserve the utmost respect & care in their final years, I totally agree,.. Good Luck to Sheila & Val.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    dave
    - October 17, 2012 at 11:15:04

    if only they were unionized...

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Ruth MacDonald
    - October 17, 2012 at 09:27:22

    I must say that I am in partial agreement with giving seniors a choice, but as the saying goes, buyer beware! The unlicensed homes are not provided with government funding, simply because they do not meet the standards set out by the Dept. of Health and Continuing Care. They are not required to have regulated service providers...ie. RNs or LPNs, or unregulated providers such as CCAs on staff. So you could have the gardener handing out the meds...and that paints a scary picture!! Some staff do not even have the basic CPR that all the subsidized homes provide for their staff. So before you consider these facilities, lets be sure that they are the places that we want our Mothers, Fathers, Grandparents etc. to be. We all want the best for our seniors, lets provide that for them.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Me Too
      - October 18, 2012 at 13:39:49

      I agree with you...these places need to be inspected by the Dept of Health and Continuing Care on a regular basis....all staff should have training....and these documents need to be visible (just like in hair salons the license where they are visible)....I wouldn't want my parents to go to a place where I was not guaranteed that they were properly looked after by "QUALIFIED" staff

  • Username
    DANA
    - October 17, 2012 at 08:24:18

    Dear Mr. Burrill, nice thing you said to the ladys that are trying to make life better for our seniors. If the beds are there , in the private care homes then lets fill them, take the stress from the hospitals . Good luck getting in Gov next time Mr.Burrill. You bring out the true NDP in yourself.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Ad Finder

May 19th 2013

View our Newspaper ads
loading...

Click here to read the latest issue!
loading...

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Bentley's List


Advertising