• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (10)
  •  

Wind concerns

For the second time in as many months, the Friends of Harmony Camden community group packed the Colchester County Council chambers on Thursday night to express their concerns about a proposed industrial wind farm for their area. Harry Sullivan - Truro Daily News

For the second time in as many months, the Friends of Harmony Camden community group packed the Colchester County Council chambers on Thursday night to express their concerns about a proposed industrial wind farm for their area. Harry Sullivan - Truro...

Published on August 17, 2012
Published on August 17, 2012
Staff ~ The Truro Daily News  RSS Feed

Harmony Camden community group seeks changes to wind turbine bylaws

Topics :
Department of Energy , Health Canada , Colchester County , Camden , Mahone Bay

TRURO - A proposed wind farm for the Harmony Camden area will not proceed without community approval, the project developer says.

"If the majority of people from the Camden Harmony area do not want this, the Comfit thing is supposed to be a community based project, right?" Councillor Gerry Buott asked Community Wind Farms CEO Keith Towse.

"If they don't want the project there, is it your intention still to put it there?"

Towse responded that his group plans to continue efforts to meet with local residents but he stated that ultimately the project would be stalled without community support. (SEE OP-ED ON PAGE 11)

"If we can't demonstrate to your satisfaction and to the satisfaction of the Department of Energy that we have community support, then we will not build the wind farm there," he said, with approximately 85 members of the Friends of Harmony Camden citizen group in attendance.

A partnership involving Community Wind Farms of Mahone Bay, the Eskasoni Corporate Division and the German-owned company, juwi Wind Canada are proposing a development to erect two industrial-sized wind turbines capable of producing 4.4-megawatts on undetermined sites in the Harmony/Camden area.

Towse told council the proposed project would represent a $10 million investment in Colchester County and would involve job creation, $200,000 in landowner payments, millions of dollars to local businesses and about $600,000 in municipal taxes over its anticipated 20-year life span, among other financial incentives.

He also said the partnership is prepared to provide a Harmony community sustainability fund, for community use, amounting to an estimated $353,440 over 20 years or an upfront payment of $110,000.

And while Towse said his company has an idea of where they would like to site the turbines, it will be nine to 12 months before that information will be finalized.

No attempt to apply for a municipal permit will be made before that information is available, he added.

This is the second time the community group has appeared before council to protest against what it describes as a lack of information from the company regarding where the turbines will be sited and also over suspected health concerns and property devaluation.

While group spokespersons Amy Thomas of Harmony and Deborah Smith of Camden both told council the community is in favour of wind energy projects, they stressed their belief that the municipal bylaw of a minimum 700-metre setback from residential properties is far from sufficient.

"We are recommending a minimum setback distance of two kilometers from property lines," Thomas said, which she said would be in keeping with similar allowances in Scotland and Australia, where wind turbine development is much further advanced than Nova Scotia.

And despite suggestions by some members of council during the group's previous presentation in June that there are no health concerns in Colchester County related to wind turbines, Smith said residents in other areas of the county are disputing such assertions.

"We now know that there are health issues. Residents from Spiddle Hill and Nuttby are talking to us," she said, adding recent information from Health Canada is also recognizing there could be health concerns.

"We now know that there is peer review support as to the effects on health for people for families who are in close proximity to industrial wind turbines," Smith said, of advice that Health Canada has offered to the Nova Scotia government regarding a wind farm project in the Digby area.

"We are a community of working familes, seniors and children. We know each other, we support each other and we're asking you to act now," Smith said. "We're asking you to adopt these proposals," she said, of a number of amendments the group would like to see made to the municipal wind turbine bylaw.

"We wish to state strongly that we're here now not only for our community but for all communities in Colchester County," she said.

Mayor Bob Taylor told the group that council's planning advisory committee is working to address its concerns a report is expected at the next council session.

Comments

  • Username
    Dawn
    - August 21, 2012 at 00:39:02

    I am with Pj and Max, and I am also a person that use to call Harmony my home......I just wonder if the people from Harmony Camden thik of the pollution they are adding to our/their environment when they get into their gas powered vehicles and drive the 10 km to town? or do they really think of what they are doing in their own back yards? Considering they live at the top of a hill....that is part of the town of Truro's water shed? I believe that people are scared of change, especially big change. Everyone needs to be opened minded about the windmills. I disagree that their property values are going to go down. Most younger people (some older)are more opened when it come to green energy and they are the ones that will be moving into the community. Remember back to when we first had to recycle? How many people thought that they were never able to do it, and the government was retarded for making us do it! ...and hey if they want to put one in my back yard....they are more than welcomed :)

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Oh my...
      - August 21, 2012 at 16:43:24

      Dawn, I certainly hope that you re-read and think about what you have written because it is incredibly arrogant. Are you really accusing the people of harmony of polluting our environment and harming the town's water supply because they happen to live on top of a hill outside of the town? Do you think that they are the only ones who drive 10km to get to town? Is this why you think that they should suffer the ill effects of having a wind farm in their backyard ... as a sort of punishment for driving up and down the hill? Comparing recycling and the installation of massive, and potentially harmful, wind turbines isn't much of valid comparison either. They are not the least bit alike.

  • Username
    hahaha
    - August 18, 2012 at 21:14:23

    These arent even great examples of wind harvesting machines.. pretty pathetic and ineffective at that. Total waste of money, we need some better thinkers in this province.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    ACE
    - August 18, 2012 at 11:19:33

    I'm with PJ. There are hundreds of these things in EIROPE and England and they look a whole bunch better than a in the landscape than an oil refinery or a fossil fuel power plant. we need to look ahead and have more green energy.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Sir Wolly
      - August 19, 2012 at 14:36:51

      People in Europe (England is also in Europe) are very unhappy. Meanwhile with 20 years of experience they know that the so called green energy is not so green. Energy prices rose round about 100% because of the subsidising of the "green" energy. There are really a lot of problems. If you are really interested in all the issues look here: http://www.epaw.org/index.php?lang=en I think it is everybodies right to care about his health, family, community and for sure his property for which everyone is working hard for.

  • Username
    Scott Hagell
    - August 18, 2012 at 10:24:11

    Can someone explain to me what exactly is wrong with "not in my backyard?" Seriously though, are we, as citizens of a free country, expected to commit some great act of altruism and allow outside entities to install massive, potentially harmful, wind turbines a few hundred meters from our homes and not express concern? PJ seems to think that the people of Harmony-Camden are wrong to oppose such a project but I have a feeling that he/she would be inclined to oppose it as well if it was their backyard and what reasonable person wouldn't oppose it. I also can't help but wonder if the President of Community Wind Farms has a wind turbine in their backyard. Readers may recall the story of the Higgins family in Moose River, Nova Scotia who happened to live on top of a gold mine and didn't realize it until an outside corporation showed up and said we now own this land and are going to mine it. It didn't matter that the family had lived on that land for more than a century and didn't want to sell it because, in the end, they didn't have any say. Our New "Democratic" government let the company expropriate the land because they saw the glitter of the gold and not the people sitting on top of it. We should all be very worried about this because it sets a dangerous precedent which can be used in all future cases and I'm worried that it might lead to a slippery slope. What will happen when our fresh water supplies become depleted? What will happen when our forests disappear? Will our government show up and expropriate these thing as well? It's about time that our governments start putting the wishes and well-being of the people they represent ahead of short-term financial gain and a couple hundred temporary jobs.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    HT
    - August 18, 2012 at 09:44:27

    PJ, As an affected community member I would like to inform you that this is in fact NOT a case of NIMBY -- it's a case of protecting ourselves, our homes and our community. Regarding the information we've been given -- that is WHY we've taken such a unified stance in opposition. The "generous financial offers" carry very little weight in our decision making and in fact this number was only made available to us on the 16th. However, the unsatisfactory and unsafe setbacks are where the majority of our concerns lie. I think if you further looked into this developing issue you too would recognize that 2km is a VERY conservative setback distance. Additionally, in your response you indicated that the Developer is being "generous" surrounding the financial offers: ' $353,440 over 20 years' is less than adequate when you consider the property devaluation that will ensue. Personally, I have spoken with local Realtors, and home appraisers who have submitted a resounding consensus of extreme property devaluation -- up to 40% for some residents within the 1 KM radius -- do you think that less than $400,000 over 20 years is still adequate?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Max
    - August 18, 2012 at 09:32:04

    It's upsetting that seemingly well intentioned people like this are the main reason we will be stuck living in a society reliant on fossil fuels. Far too many people live with the attitude that "I won't be alive in a hundred years, so it won't matter". It's a sad day when people are against switching to green power because of property values and arbitrary "health hazards". The ironic thing is that the health hazards of NOT using green power aren't mentioned at all. Why? Because they've been living with them for so long, they don't even realize they are problems, yet they are far worse than anything ever reported from a wind turbine. So much for our future or that of our kids and their kids.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    PJ
    - August 18, 2012 at 09:10:31

    If the community insists upon the 2km setback, the companies generous financial offers should be reduced. Except for the exact location (uncertain due to contract negotiations with landowners), the citizens have now been given virtually every detail of the project. Hope this is not a case of "We support green energy, just NIMBY".

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Mike Barnard
    - August 17, 2012 at 23:48:06

    17 major reviews world-wide of thousands of peer-reviewed research studies have found that wind farms do not cause health problems. They have all found that a small number of people very close to wind farms find the noise annoying. 700 meters is great than Ontario's setback which is one of the most stringent in the world. It's more than necessary to achieve noise levels in bedrooms that are in alignment with world wide health standards. And bluntly, it's more than necessary to make noise levels much lower than in urban areas. http://www.quora.com/Wind-Power/What-might-cause-people-who-live-near-wind-turbines-to-get-sick/answer/Mike-Barnard

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Bentley's List


Ad Finder

May 26th 2013

View our Newspaper ads
loading...

Click here to read the latest issue!
loading...

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising