Customize your website

New look in store for downtown motorists



Lights will soon be installed to allow traffic to turn left from Young Street onto Prince Street and then right onto Lorne Street in downtown Truro. It is designed to create a two-way, north-sound connector through the centre of town while improving safet

Lights will soon be installed to allow traffic to turn left from Young Street onto Prince Street and then right onto Lorne Street in downtown Truro. It is designed to create a two-way, north-sound connector through the centre of town while improving safet

Published on August 30th, 2010
Published on August 30th, 2010
Jason Malloy RSS Feed

Driving to CEC, stadium and Robie Street could become much easier for many residents

Topics :
First United Church , Lorne Street , Prince Street , TRURO

TRURO - A dramatic change is coming to a downtown Truro intersection.

The town will be adding lights to the intersection at Young and Prince streets to allow traffic to turn left from Young onto Prince and then right onto Lorne Street.

"The big thing is to give the traffic that currently shortcuts through the heritage streets ... a more palatable alternative through a main street," said director of public works Andrew MacKinnon. "The other big objective is to try to get the residential traffic to use Young Street to get to the high school and stadium."

Motorists currently coming down Young Street have to turn west and come down Pleasant or Faulkner-Muir-Arlington to get to Prince Street in order to turn down Lorne. The other alternative from Young is to turn right onto Prince and take Church and Queen streets to get back to Lorne.

"We think it will improve the traffic flow quite significantly," Mayor Bill Mills said. The change "might eliminate some people from going around in circles."

Signage will start going up this morning but the lights are not expected to be installed and operational until late September at the earliest. It is part of the town's education phase of installing the new lights, knowing the changes will take time for people to get used to.

"It will make a big difference for people going to school in the morning," said Coun. Greg MacArthur, who added it will be useful for motorists going to the Prince Street churches or town hall.

Another change will see traffic heading east on Prince Street, which plans on continuing downtown, need to be in the right-hand lane as they approach town hall. Traffic in the left-hand lane will have to turn onto Lorne Street.

Traffic turning left from Young onto Prince will only be able to use the right-hand lane on Prince Street.

MacKinnon expects the project will have the most impact on improving traffic in town since the intersections of Willow and Prince and Court streets were realigned about a decade ago.

Atlantic Road & Traffic Management recommended realigning Young and Lorne streets in a 2005 study commissioned by the town. At that point it was suggested land would need to be acquired from the Burchell MacDougall law firm and the First United Church, but that proposal is not being acted upon.

"There's land acquisition and expenses involved the town doesn't want to incur at this time," MacKinnon said.

Another recommendation from the 2005 traffic study was to consider reducing the four-way stops on Arthur Street. At that time, between 87 and 77 per cent of the traffic at the King, Dominion and Pleasant street intersections was travelling on Arthur Street, while good traffic management suggested four-way stops are warranted if there is an equal amount of traffic from the side streets and Arthur Street.

It is hoped more traffic will use Young Street, which would impact the traffic crossing Arthur Street. But further study would need to be done before stop signs are removed on Arthur Street.

jmalloy@trurodaily.com

Comments

  • Username
    pj
    - September 3rd, 2010 at 09:03:07

    One parking garage can not serve the spread out businesses along Prince so that would not be a solution. Add to that the fact that Prince St. is very narrow a even now, vehicles often have to cross the center line to avoid vehicles parked out from the curb a bit. The one-way situation works well for safety and downtown access but having now a straight through bottleneck with the left turn only is not a good plan. The excuse that it would reduce head on accidents is wrong-minded since vehicles making the left-right onto Lorne would not stay in that lane but cross all lanes. Now, it's not so easy.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Kevin
    - September 1st, 2010 at 08:34:33

    I agree with those that say the front lawn of the law firm would be best. For the amount of traffic I find driving through Truro very slow compared to other towns and cities. The over abundance of four way stops is comical. In this time when we look at ways to be greener having too many unnessary stops is just plain wasteful not to mention slow and annoying. Many will argue well we need to slow the cars down because of the children, but....... in those areas most polluted with these four way signs I have rarely seen children. Using four way stops and excessive street lights for speed control is just not a very green way of doing things. I drive through town a lot more than previously when mostly commuting in Bible Hill area and noticed my gas mileage has dropped severely. Actually thought at first my odometer must be malfunctioning but no......... just a very marked increase of stopping and waiting. Another stop light in a town already overpoplulated with them a good thing............. Hmmmm

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Karen
      - September 1st, 2010 at 10:56:46

      In a nutshell.....I really see no purpose in having Prince Street as a one-way street. Making it 2-way would allow for a better flow of traffic through the town`s core instead of driving around in circles and confusing tourists.

  • Username
    Byron
    - August 31st, 2010 at 15:11:44

    Further to my comments. Why doesn't the Town of Truro just expropriate the front lawn of the Burchell MacDougall law firm and put in a connector lane to the Lorne St. intersection from Young St? That to me would be the most logical and safest method. Then the Burchell MacDougall law firm would have less lawn to maintain and save on their maintenance costs. To be a good corporate citizen they should donate the land and claim it as a tax exemption loss. Either way, the law firm would save money. The intersection would be safer for the public and less confusing. Then only one set of lights would be required instead of two. Logically that makes more sense than the confusion of turning onto a one way street the wrong way.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Byron
    - August 31st, 2010 at 14:34:30

    I have to agree with MIKE. It will be entertaining watching the confusion especially tourists and those who are set in their ways (I would say old ppl but I am now one of them now) and those who have poor visual acuity and are still under the wheel driving. It will be interesting to see how many ppl continue down Prince St. the wrong way past Lorne St. Not to mention those who ignore the must turn left signs and continue up Prince St in the left lane past Lorne and Young Streets and meet vehicles coming toward them when the light changes. I think the recommendation of the Atlantic Road & Traffic Management aligning the streets, Young and Lorne would be a better option. Since they are the experts. Even if the town has to expropriate the land to do it for the betterment of traffic flow and safety. I think the current plan to turn onto a long standing one way street the wrong way is not a very good idea (I would say dumb but that wouldn't be politically correct) I would like to have a web cam installed to watch the two intersections so I and others can observe the confusion.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Jason
    - August 31st, 2010 at 13:58:22

    Education: Before you start harassing other people because of spelling mistakes and calling them idiots for it, try taking a look at your self first. a.) check your grammar and learn how to use a comma b.) openingly? , forgive me as I cannot find this word anywhere in the dictionary. To everyone else, apologies for ranting and for not having anything constructive to say.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Gilliad
    - August 31st, 2010 at 13:41:19

    I've got an even better idea, but I don't expect it to go any further than previous similar versions. 1 - Get rid of parking on Prince Street. 2 - Build at least one parking garage in the downtown core, wherever that may be. 3 - Turn Prince Street back in a dual direction thoroughfare. There - wasn't that easy? Yes, I know, too easy. Which is why it will never happen.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Montgomery
    - August 31st, 2010 at 11:46:35

    At first glance this could be a good idea. I'm skeptical about the changes as it would cause extended red lights for folks traveling East on Prince st. which during heavy traffic could leave to heavy congestion. We'll see.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Education
    - August 31st, 2010 at 09:53:42

    Seriously folks, the only uneducated idiots are "Former Resident" and "Brenda". Former Resident, I suggest you better go get some education yourself by the looks of your spelling, and Brenda, if you can't follow traffic lights then it would best if you joined Former Resident in the classroom. This is a great idea for those that have to back track to get around Prince Street. The idea to get rid of some of the stop signs on Arthur street would be openingly accepted as well. Thanks, to the town, once again, for always looking for ways to improve our community.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Former Resident
    - August 31st, 2010 at 08:49:24

    Wow how confusing is this goin to be?? Another well thought out plan by the top athouraties of the town, educated idiots takeing another short cut instead of spending the proper money to purchase the property required to make it a direct north /south run ,the only positive will be that you will be actually be able to go north/south and hopefully cut down the traffic in the downtown.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    tasman
    - August 31st, 2010 at 08:49:07

    I think Truro has enough lights and stop signs already. This won't improve anything. They are just wasting more money and trying to make it look like they are doing something worthwhile.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    mike
    - August 31st, 2010 at 08:49:01

    Am I the only one who thinks this is a stupid idea? It's not as if East Coast towns don't already have their fair share of mixed up one way streets and perplexing intersections. Well now it looks like Truro is going to come out on top again. Lets make an intersection with a 50 meter stretch of road that goes the wrong way on a one way street. I do love watching the tourists driving up the esplinade and inglis and somtimes prince so maybe this could be a focal point for me to watch total confusion (please install some benches) as people decide wether they should be turning left onto a one way street.... follow the leader i guess but still seems bad.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Brenda
    - August 31st, 2010 at 08:48:25

    You have got to be kidding!!! Anyone want to guess how many vehicles are going to keep going left up Prince Street and not turn down Lorne? I just shake my head when I hear the town doing things like this.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

Truro Daily News is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

loading...

Click here to read the latest issue!

Advertising